Volume 29, Issue 2 (6-2020)
JGUMS 2020, 29(2): 14-29 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nemati S, Attarchi M, Pourghane P, Rafiee E, Bakhshi F. Study of Barriers to Research in Faculty Members of Guilan University of Medical Sciences in 2017: A Mixed Method. JGUMS 2020; 29 (2) :14-29
URL: http://journal.gums.ac.ir/article-1-2287-en.html
URL: http://journal.gums.ac.ir/article-1-2287-en.html
1- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
2- Department of Forensic Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
3- Department of Nursing, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
4- Razi Clinical Research Development Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
5- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
2- Department of Forensic Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
3- Department of Nursing, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
4- Razi Clinical Research Development Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
5- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
Abstract: (1965 Views)
Introduction: The extent of development of a country is determined by research indicators such as the number of published articles. Many factors can cause a lack of research.
Objective: The present study aimed at identifying obstacles to the implementation of the research from the viewpoint of faculty members of Guilan University of Medical Sciences in 2018.
Materials and Methods: In this combined research, the quantitative data were collected by the faculty members of the research pathology questionnaire. The appropriate statistical indices were used to describe the data. In the qualitative section, sampling was purposeful and continued until data saturation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and data analysis was carried out using a seven-step content analysis approach. The accuracy and accuracy of the data were also determined by Lincoln & Guba's proposed criteria.
Results: In the quantitative part, the most important inhibitor factors include management factors (low communication between university and foreign universities), empowerment factors (lack of familiarity with relevant statistical techniques), administrative rules (length of paper publishing stages), and personal factors (teaching too much), social factors (inadequate intellectual incentives) and economic factors (inadequate research budget and lack of research facilities). In the qualitative section, the four main categories (individual challenges, dysfunctional infrastructure, Limited Research Partner, and discouragement of the research result) and fifteen sub-floors were extracted.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, in order to improve the quantitative and qualitative research among faculty members, it is suggested that the respective authorities consider such issues as strengthening the research motivation of faculty members taking advantage of research facilities and special privileges, and also equivalence of research tasks.
Objective: The present study aimed at identifying obstacles to the implementation of the research from the viewpoint of faculty members of Guilan University of Medical Sciences in 2018.
Materials and Methods: In this combined research, the quantitative data were collected by the faculty members of the research pathology questionnaire. The appropriate statistical indices were used to describe the data. In the qualitative section, sampling was purposeful and continued until data saturation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and data analysis was carried out using a seven-step content analysis approach. The accuracy and accuracy of the data were also determined by Lincoln & Guba's proposed criteria.
Results: In the quantitative part, the most important inhibitor factors include management factors (low communication between university and foreign universities), empowerment factors (lack of familiarity with relevant statistical techniques), administrative rules (length of paper publishing stages), and personal factors (teaching too much), social factors (inadequate intellectual incentives) and economic factors (inadequate research budget and lack of research facilities). In the qualitative section, the four main categories (individual challenges, dysfunctional infrastructure, Limited Research Partner, and discouragement of the research result) and fifteen sub-floors were extracted.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, in order to improve the quantitative and qualitative research among faculty members, it is suggested that the respective authorities consider such issues as strengthening the research motivation of faculty members taking advantage of research facilities and special privileges, and also equivalence of research tasks.
Keywords: Iran/Research/University
Review Paper: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2020/09/7 | Accepted: 2020/06/30 | Published: 2020/06/30
Received: 2020/09/7 | Accepted: 2020/06/30 | Published: 2020/06/30
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Contact Information
Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences
Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences P.O. Box: 41938-93345, Iran
Tel/Fax: + (98-13)33330939
Email: medjour@gums.ac.ir
URL: http://www.Journals.gums.ac.ir
