Volume 31, Issue 3 (10-2022)                   JGUMS 2022, 31(3): 260-273 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jazaeri M, Abdolsamadi H, Khazaie S, Shahabi L. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Level in Patients With Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JGUMS 2022; 31 (3) :260-273
URL: http://journal.gums.ac.ir/article-1-2511-en.html
1- Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
2- Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
3- Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. , l.shahabi@yahoo.com
Full-Text [PDF 4071 kb]   (400 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1144 Views)
Full-Text:   (488 Views)
Introduction
Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a common chronic inflammatory disease that usually affects the skin and mucous membranes of middle-aged women [12]. Since there is a predilection for malignant transformation of OLP lesions, early diagnosis is necessary [3, 45]. Angiogenesis or the formation of new blood vessels normally occurs during human evolution and reproduction; however, uncontrolled angiogenesis is a process found in a variety of pathological conditions, including cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors play a major role in angiogenesis and are often highly expressed in human cancers. Early clinical efforts to develop anti-angiogenic therapies have largely focused on inhibiting VEGF and its receptors [6]. Considering that no study has been conducted on changes in VEGF in patients with OLP and the possible malignant transformation of OLP lesions, the present meta-analysis and systematic review aims to evaluate the level of VEGF in patients with OLP.
Methods
In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, the search was conducted in online databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus on studies published until 2021. The following search strategy was applied: (((((Oral lichen planus [Title / Abstract]) OR OLP [Title / Abstract]) OR Oral Lichenoid Lesion [Title / Abstract]))) AND (((((((Vessel endothelial growth factor [Title / Abstract]) OR VEGF [Title / Abstract]). The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale [8]. The data were analyzed in the Stata v. 14 software at a 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random effect model. The standardized mean difference was used to measure the difference in the VEGF level between the two groups of OLP and controls. Heterogeneity in the results of studies was evaluated using the Chi-square test (χ2) [9]. The I2 index was used to quantify the heterogeneity [10]. Bias in the published studies was evaluated using the Begg and Egger tests [11, 12]. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to evaluate the effect of missing studies using the trim-and-fill method.
Results
A total of 6 articles were selected for the present meta-analysis [7, 1415161718] (Table 1).


The sample size of patients with OLP, diagnosed based on clinical and histological examinations, ranged from 10 to 36. For the control group, i.e., healthy individuals without clinical presentation of OLP, the sample size ranged from 10 to 40. Among the articles, there were 2 studies conducted in Iran, and others were conducted in Egypt, China, India, and New Zealand. Two studies used the ELISA method, 3 studies used the immunohistochemistry method, and one study used the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method to evaluate the VEGF level (Figure 1).

There was no significant difference between the two groups of OLP and controls at the VEGF level (standardized mean difference=0.46, 95% CI: -2.13, -3.05) and the I2 index showed significant heterogeneity among the results of studies (I2=97.9%) (Figure 2).

Based on the immunohistochemistry results, there was a significant difference in the VEGF level between the two groups (standardized mean difference=3.30, 95% CI: 6.25, -0.36), although the difference between these two groups was not statistically significant in the ELISA method (P = 0.530) (Figure 3).

Discussion
The results of the reviewed studies showed that the VEGF level in patients with OLP was higher compared to the control group. In all types of OLP, an increase in VEGF was seen compared to healthy individuals. More increase occurred in patients with atrophic/erosive OLP than in patients with other forms of OLP (19,20). Since the level of VEGF in patients with OLP is higher than in healthy people, the serum factors which indicate VEGF should be considered an effective risk factor for OLP. 

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (Ethics Code: IR.UMSHA.REC.1400.544).

Funding
This study was extracted from a research project. It was funded by the Dental Research Center of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.

Authors' contributions
Study concept and design: Hamidreza Abdolsamadi, Mina Jazaeri; Data acquisition, analysis, or interpretation: Salman Khazaei, Laleh Shahabi; Preparing the initial draft: Laleh Shahabi, Mina Jazaeri; Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Mina Jazaeri, Laleh Shahabi; Statistical analysis: Salman Khazzaei; Funding acquisition: Hamidreza Abdolsamadi; Supervision: Mina Jazaeri, Laleh Shahabi.

Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Technology and the Dental Research Center of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences for their support.


References
  1. Pakfetrat A, Dalirsani Z, Nematy M, Esmaily H, Pishbin A, Sheikhveysi M. Association between dietary patterns and oral lichen planus. Journal of Biochemical Technology. 2019; 2:176-83. [Link]
  2. Ramesh S, Nazeer SS, Thomas S, Vivek V, Jayasree RS. Optical diagnosis of oral lichen planus: A clinical study on the use of autofluorescence spectroscopy combined with multivariate analysis. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2021; 248:119240. [DOI:10.1016/j.saa.2020.119240] [PMID]
  3. Warnakulasuriya S, Kujan O, Aguirre-Urizar JM, Bagan JV, González-Moles MÁ, Kerr AR, et al. Oral potentially malignant disorders: A consensus report from an international seminar on nomenclature and classification, convened by the WHO collaborating centre for oral cancer. Oral Diseases. 2021; 27(8):1862-80. [DOI:10.1111/odi.13704] [PMID]
  4. Daye M, Temiz SA, Isık B. The relationship between lichen planus and metabolic syndrome. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2021; 20(8):2635-9. [DOI:10.1111/jocd.13905] [PMID]
  5. Zhao Y, Adjei AA. Targeting angiogenesis in cancer therapy: Moving beyond vascular endothelial growth factor. The Oncologist. 2015; 20(6):660-73. [DOI:10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0465] [PMID] [PMCID]
  6. Melincovici CS, Boşca AB, Şuşman S, Mărginean M, Mihu C, Istrate M, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-key factor in normal and pathological angiogenesis.Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology. 2018; 59(2):455-67. [PMID]
  7. Al-Hassiny A, Friedlander L, Parachuru V, Seo B, Hussaini H, Rich A. Upregulation of angiogenesis in oral lichen planus. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine. 2018; 47(2):173-8. [DOI:10.1111/jop.12665] [PMID]
  8. Wells G, Shea B, O’connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The newcastle-ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2016. [Updated 2022 October]. Available at: [Link]
  9. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane Book Series. Hoboken: Wiley; 2008. [DOI:10.1002/9780470712184]
  10. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327(7414):557-60. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557] [PMID] [PMCID]
  11. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994; 50(4):1088-101. [DOI:10.2307/2533446] [PMID]
  12. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997; 315(7109):629-34. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629] [PMID] [PMCID]
  13. Duval S, Tweedie R. A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2000; 95(449):89-98. [DOI:10.2307/2669529]
  14. Scardina GA, Ruggieri A, Maresi E, Messina P. Angiogenesis in oral lichen planus: An in vivo and immunohistological evaluation. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis. 2011; 59(6):457-62. [DOI:10.1007/s00005-011-0150-1] [PMID]
  15. Xu XH, Liu Y, Feng L, Yang YS, Liu SG, Guo W, et al. Interleukin6 released by oral lichen planus myofibroblasts promotes angiogenesis. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2021; 21(4):291. [DOI:10.3892/etm.2021.9722] [PMID] [PMCID]
  16. Mahmoud MM, Afifi MM. Anti-angiogenic therapy (bevacizumab) in the management of oral lichen planus. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2016; 124(2):119-26. [DOI:10.1111/eos.12251] [PMID]
  17. Metwaly H, Ebrahem MA-M, Saku T. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in oral lichen planus: An immunohistochemical study for the correlation between vascular and inflammatory reactions. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology. 2014; 26(3):390-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajoms.2013.09.009]
  18. Mardani M, Ghabanchi J, Fattahi MJ, Tadbir AA. Serum level of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with different clinical subtypes of oral lichen planus. Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012; 37(4):233-7. [PMID] [PMCID]
  19. Ding M, Xu J, Fan Y. Altered expression of mRNA for HIF-1α and its target genes RTP801and VEGF in patients with oral lichen planus. Oral Diseases. 2010; 16(3):299-304. [DOI:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01645.x] [PMID]
  20. Agha-Hosseini F, Mirzaii-Dizgah I, Mohebbian M, Sarookani M. Vascular endothelial growth factor in serum and saliva of oral lichen planus and oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. 2018; 25(1):27-33. [Link]
  21. Hazzaa HH, El Shiekh MA, Abdelgawad N, Gouda OM, Kamal NM. Correlation of VEGF and MMP-2 levels in oral lichen planus: An in vivo immunohistochemical study. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2020; 10(4):747-52. [DOI:10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.10.009] [PMID] [PMCID]
  22. Sheelam S, Reddy SP, Kulkarni PG, Nandan S, Keerthi M, Raj GS. Role of cell proliferation and vascularity in malignant transformation of potentially malignant disorders. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 2018; 22(2):281. [DOI:10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_182_17] [PMID] [PMCID]
  23. González-Moles MÁ, Ramos-García P, Warnakulasuriya S. An appraisal of highest quality studies reporting malignant transformation of oral lichen planus based on a systematic review. Oral Diseases. 2021; 27(8):1908-18. [DOI:10.1111/odi.13741] [PMID]
  24. Tsushima F, Sakurai J, Uesugi A, Oikawa Y, Ohsako T, Mochizuki Y, et al. Malignant transformation of oral lichen planus: A retrospective study of 565 Japanese patients. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12903-021-01652-7] [PMID] [PMCID]
  25. Sugerman PB, Sabage N. Oral lichen planus: Causes, diagnosis and management. Australian Dental Journal. 2002; 47(4):290-7. [DOI:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2002.tb00540.x] [PMID]
  26. Sugerman P, Savage N, Walsh L, Zhao Z, Zhou X, Khan A, et al. The pathogenesis of oral lichen planus. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine. 2002; 13(4):350-65. [DOI:10.1177/154411130201300405] [PMID]
  27. Kuryliszyn-Moskal A, Klimiuk PA, Sierakowski S, Ciołkiewicz M. Vascular endothelial growth factor in systemic lupus erythematosus: Relationship to disease activity, systemic organ manifestation, and nailfold capillaroscopic abnormalities. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis. 2007; 55(3):179-85. [DOI:10.1007/s00005-007-0017-7] [PMID] [PMCID]
  28. Ciołkiewicz M, Kuryliszyn-Moskal A, Klimiuk PA. Analysis of correlations between selected endothelial cell activation markers, disease activity, and nailfold capillaroscopy microvascular changes in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Clinical Rheumatology. 2010; 29(2):175-80. [DOI:10.1007/s10067-009-1308-7] [PMID]
  29. Rhodus NL, Cheng B, Myers S, Bowles W, Ho V, Ondrey F. A comparison of the pro-inflammatory, NF-κB-dependent cytokines: TNF-alpha, IL-1-alpha, IL-6, and IL-8 in different oral fluids from oral lichen planus patients. Clinical Immunology. 2005; 114(3):278-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.clim.2004.12.003] [PMID]
  30. Gururaj N, Hasinidevi P, Janani V, Divynadaniel T. Diagnosis and management of oral lichen planus - Review. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 2021; 25(3):383-93. [DOI:10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_386_21] [PMID] [PMCID]
  31. Farhadi S, Ghorbanpour M, Pourabed F, Lotfi A. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in oral lichen planus: A comparative study. Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences. 2018; 3(1):1-5. [DOI:10.29252/jrdms.3.1.1]
  32. Shiva A, Zamanian A, Arab S, Boloki M. Immunohistochemical study of p53 expression in patients with erosive and non-erosive oral lichen planus. Journal of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. 2018; 19(2):118-23. [PMID] [PMCID]

 
Review Paper: Applicable | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/03/5 | Accepted: 2022/06/19 | Published: 2022/10/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb