Volume 32, Issue 4 (1-2024)                   JGUMS 2024, 32(4): 266-281 | Back to browse issues page

Research code: IR.KUMS.REC.1400.162
Ethics code: IR.KUMS.REC.1400.162


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rezakhani L, Khazaei M R, Faramarzi A, Khazaei M. Molecular Factors Affecting Embryo Implantation: A Narrative Review. JGUMS 2024; 32 (4) :266-281
URL: http://journal.gums.ac.ir/article-1-2591-en.html
1- 1- Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
2- 2- Department of Tissue Engineering, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
3- Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
4- Department of Tissue Engineering, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 7485 kb]   (747 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2095 Views)
Full-Text:   (2098 Views)
Introduction
Embryo Implantation is a very important step in the development of mammalian fetuses. Successful embryo implantation requires a close interaction of the endometrium with the uterus. These mutual interactions in a limited period are known as receptivity window or “window of implantation” [1]. Embryo implantation consists of three stages: Apposition, attachment, and penetration. In mammals, including humans, after entering the uterus, the embryo (blastocyst) leaves the zona pellucida and interacts with the epithelium [2]. 
The uterine receptivity is regulated by the ovarian hormones of estrogen and progesterone. Under their influence, some cytokines and growth factors also play an important role in the blastocyst-uterus interaction during implantation. Knowing the function of these molecules during this process can help understand the causes of embryo implantation failure and infertility [3]. The present study aims to investigate the factors involved in embryo implantation.

Methods
In this review study, a search was conducted for studies published in English or Persian between 2000 and 2023 in national and international databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, MagIran, and Google Scholar using the keywords “embryo implantation”, “factors affecting implantation” and “infertility”. The reference lists of the found articles were also manually searched. The case reports, letters to the editor, experimental studies, studies with unavailable full texts, and studies with unclear methodology were excluded. The articles were evaluated separately by two authors to identify related studies. Finally, the results of the studies were presented narratively and analytically.

Results
The main hormones affecting the uterine receptivity are progesterone and estrogen. Progesterone is essential for the implantation and maintenance of pregnancy in all mammals, while estrogen is required for certain species. In mice, progesterone and estrogen are necessary for embryo implantation, while in pigs, guinea pigs, rabbits, and hamsters, estrogen is not required; however, it is considered important for implantation. In humans, although the role of estrogen or the embryo is not fully clear, we know that the effects of estrogen and progesterone are mainly created by estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) [4].
The interaction of the blastocyst with the receptive uterus is very important for the production of trophoblastic cytokines and uterine epithelium. They modulate endometrial receptivity by regulating the expression of different molecules of attachment phase [5]. Embryo implantation is a type of inflammatory response. Several cytokines have been identified in the implantation site, many of which have embryonic origin. Interleukin-1 (IL-1), as one of the paracrine factors, modulates the interaction between the endometrium and the embryo, and is the key regulator of the inflammatory response. As a cytokine, it is able to create a wide range of effects in all types of cells [6]. Interleukin-11 (IL-11) expression in human endometrial tissue is also important during decidualization. An in-vitro study showed that leukemia-inhibitory factor (LIF) and IL-11 play a role in the regulation of cell adhesion in endometrial epithelium. In clinical studies, it has been reported that the plasma IL-11 level is lower in women with abortion in the first trimester compared to women with normal pregnancies [7].
The transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) from the epidermal growth factor family in three different isoforms (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, β3-TGF) has profound effects on extracellular matrix production and enzyme degradation. In addition, TGF-β isoforms are found at the blastocyst-uterus interface and play an important role in the implantation process. TGF- β family members are expressed in the endometrium and play an active role in modulating cellular events, including regulation of cell proliferation, decidualization, and implantation process [8].
HOX genes are transcription factors that have a fundamental role in determining the identity of tissues during embryonic development and are involved in the development of Müllerian ducts (the female reproductive tract) and their expression are continued in the adult uterus. These genes are most likely to be the main regulators of embryo implantation in humans. HOX genes also act as regulators of morphogenesis and embryonic differentiation. Two HOX genes are required for fertility in mice. Female mice with targeted disruption of HOXA10 or HOXA11 are viable, but not fertile. Targeted disruption of HOXA11 can reduce the development of endometrial glands of stromal and also reduce the expression of LIF. The HOX genes may direct the development of the adult endometrium toward implantation. HOX gene expression in maternal endometrium can regulate fertility [9].
Morphogenic molecules cause cell differentiation and patterning in a concentration-dependent manner. The role of morphogens in uterine receptivity and embryo implantation has less been studies. Embryo-uterine interactions during implantation share many features of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during embryonic development, and both conserve signaling pathways. The importance of hedgehog, Wnt, and BMP signaling pathways in uterine receptivity has been reported [10].

Conclusion
For embryo implantation, different messenger molecules such as cytokines, growth factors, and ovarian hormones are involved in uterine receptivity. Cytokines (LIF, IL-1, IL-6, IL-11), colony-stimulating factor (CSF-1), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) play an important role in embryo- uterine interactions during the implantation process. HOX gene expression in the endometrium can regulate fertility. HOXA10 is regulated by estrogen and progesterone in the adult human uterus. These two hormones increases HOXA10 expression. However, an important part of their dependent or independent function is still unknown. Therefore, efforts in this field seem necessary. It can help to better understand the embryo implantation process and resolve the cause of implantation failure and infertility. Understanding the biology and molecular factors affecting embryo implantation can reduce female infertility and help create new infertility treatments (Figure 1).


Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.KUMS.REC.1400.162).

Funding
This research did not receive any funding from funding organizations in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

Authors' contributions
Study concept and design: Leila Rezakhani; Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript: Leila Rezakhani, Mohammad Rasool Khazaei, Azita Faramarzi; Critical revision: Leila Rezakhani, Mozafar Khazaei, Azita Faramarzi; Administrative, technical, or material support, study supervision: Mozafar Khazaei.

Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to the Fertility and Infertility Research Center and the Tissue Engineering Department of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences for their cooperation.


References
  1. Haghighi H, Vaziri H R, Zahiri Z. [Analysis of association of FSHR 1255G>A polymorphism with infertility in women (Persian)]. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences. 2016; 25(99):26-33. [Link]
  2. Sehring J, Beltsos A, Jeelani R. Human implantation: The complex interplay between endometrial receptivity, inflammation, and the microbiome. Placenta. 2022; 117:179-86. [DOI:10.1016/j.placenta.2021.12.015] [PMID]
  3. Hamid HY, Zakaria MZ. Embryo implantation: Shedding light on the roles of ovarian hormones, cytokines and growth factors in the implantation process. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2012; 11(97):16297-304. [Link]
  4. Evazalipour M, Aghajani Torshkooh F, Jafari-Shakib R, Gholampour S, Zamani E. [In vitro evaluation of protective effect of rutin on acrylamide-induced cellular senescence in NIH3T3 Cells (Persian)]. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences. 2022; 30(4):276-89. [Link]
  5. Sharma A, Kumar P. Understanding implantation window, a crucial phenomenon. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2012; 5(1):2-6.  [DOI:10.4103/0974-1208.97777] [PMID]
  6. Yoshinaga K. A historical review of blastocyst implantation research. Biology of Reproduction. 2018; 99(1):175-95. [DOI:10.1093/biolre/ioy093] [PMID]
  7. Paulson EE, Comizzoli P. Endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation in carnivores-commonalities and differences with other mammalian species. Biology of Reproduction. 2021; 104(4):771-83. [DOI:10.1093/biolre/ioab001] [PMID]
  8. Omidi M, Khalili MA, Agha- Rahimi A, Nottola S, Anbari F, Faramarzi A, et al. Efficacy of the in vitro splitting of human preimplantation embryos from ART programs. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 51(1):68-75. [DOI:10.3906/sag-1710-194] [PMID]
  9. Fazleabas AT, Kim JJ, Strakova Z. Implantation: Embryonic signals and the modulation of the uterine environment-a review. Placenta. 2004; 25(Suppl A):S26-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.placenta.2004.01.014] [PMID]
  10. Faramarzi A, Khalili MA, Mangoli E. Correlations between embryo morphokinetic development and maternal age: Results from an intracytoplasmic sperm injection program. Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine. 2019; 46(3):119-24. [DOI:10.5653/cerm.2019.02838] [PMID]
  11. Ramathal CY, Bagchi IC, Taylor RN, Bagchi MK. Endometrial decidualization: of mice and men.  Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 2010; 28(1):17-26. [DOI:10.1055/s-0029-1242989] [PMID]
  12. Kim JJ, Fazleabas AT. Uterine receptivity and implantation: The regulation and action of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), HOXA10 and forkhead transcription factor-1 (FOXO-1) in the baboon endometrium. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2004; 2:34. [PMID]
  13. Altmäe S, Reimand J, Hovatta O, Zhang P, Kere J, Laisk T, et al. Research resource: Interactome of human embryo implantation: identification of gene expression pathways, regulation, and integrated regulatory networks. Molecular Endocrinology. 2012; 26(1):203-17. [DOI:10.1210/me.2011-1196] [PMID]
  14. Wu HM, Chen LH, Hsu LT, Sung YJ, Chiu WJ, Tsai CL. Leukaemia inhibitory factor-STAT signaling and adhesion molecules in human decidual stromal cells: possible role on embryo implantation and early pregnancy. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2023.  [DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.03.012]
  15. Wang H, Dey SK. Roadmap to embryo implantation: Clues from mouse models. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2006; 7(3):185-99. [DOI:10.1038/nrg1808] [PMID]
  16. Iwamoto R, Yamazaki S, Asakura M, Takashima S, Hasuwa H, Miyado K, et al. Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor and ErbB signaling is essential for heart function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003; 100(6):3221-6. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.0537588100] [PMID]
  17. Faramarzi A, Khalili MA, Ashourzadeh S. Oocyte morphology and embryo morphokinetics in an intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection programme. Is there a relationship? Zygote. 2017; 25(2):190-6. [DOI:10.1017/S0967199417000041] [PMID]
  18. Dey SK, Lim H, Das SK, Reese J, Paria BC, Daikoku T, et al. Molecular cues to implantation. Endocrine Reviews. 2004; 25(3):341-73.  [DOI:10.1210/er.2003-0020] [PMID]
  19. Fouladi-Nashta AA, Jones CJ, Nijjar N, Mohamet L, Smith A, Chambers I, et al. Characterization of the uterine phenotype during the peri-implantation period for LIF-null, MF1 strain mice. Developmental Biology. 2005; 281(1):1-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.01.033] [PMID]
  20. Khazaei M, Aghaz F. Reactive oxygen species generation and use of antioxidants during in vitro maturation of oocytes. International Journal of Fertility & Sterility. 2017; 11(2):63-70. [PMID]
  21. Song H, Lim H, Paria BC, Matsumoto H, Swift LL, Morrow J,  et al. Cytosolic phospholipase A2alpha is crucial [correction of A2alpha deficiency is crucial] for 'on-time' embryo implantation that directs subsequent development. Development. 2002; 129(12):2879-89. [DOI:10.1242/dev.129.12.2879] [PMID]
  22. Wetendorf M, DeMayo FJ. The progesterone receptor regulates implantation, decidualization, and glandular development via a complex paracrine signaling network. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2012; 357(1-2):108-18. [DOI:10.1016/j.mce.2011.10.028] [PMID]
  23. Lee JH, Kim TH, Oh SJ, Yoo JY, Akira S, Ku BJ, et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (Stat3) plays a critical role in implantation via progesterone receptor in uterus. The FASEB Journal. 2013; 27(7):2553-63. [DOI:10.1096/fj.12-225664] [PMID]
  24. Ghanbari E, Khazaei MR, Khazaei M, Nejati V. Royal jelly promotes ovarian follicles growth and increases steroid hormones in immature rats. International Journal of Fertility & Sterility. 2018; 11(4):263-69. [PMID]
  25. Simón C, Martín JC, Pellicer A. Paracrine regulators of implantation. Bailliere's Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2000; 14(5):815-26. [DOI:10.1053/beog.2000.0121] [PMID]
  26. Esfandiari N, Khazaei M, Ai J, Bielecki R, Gotlieb L, Ryan E,  et al. Effect of a statin on an in vitro model of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility. 2007; 87(2):257-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.040] [PMID]
  27. Guzeloglu-Kayisli O, Kayisli UA, Taylor HS. The role of growth factors and cytokines during implantation: Endocrine and paracrine interactions. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 2009; 27(1):62–79. [DOI:10.1055/s-0028-1108011] [PMID]
  28. Wang Q, Sun Y, Fan R, Wang M, Ren C, Jiang A,  et al. Role of inflammatory factors in the etiology and treatment of recurrent implantation failure. Reproductive Biology. 2022; 22(4):100698.  [DOI:10.1016/j.repbio.2022.100698] [PMID]
  29. Salleh N, Giribabu N. Leukemia inhibitory factor: Roles in embryo implantation and in nonhormonal contraception. The Scientific World Journal. 2014; 2014:201514. [DOI:10.1155/2014/201514] [PMID]
  30. Nicola NA, Babon JJ. Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews. 2015; 26(5):533-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.07.001] [PMID]
  31. Aghajanova L. Update on the role of leukemia inhibitory factor in assisted reproduction. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010; 22(3):213-9. [DOI:10.1097/GCO.0b013e32833848e5] [PMID]
  32. Steck T, Giess R, Suetterlin MW, Bolland M, Wiest S, Poehls UG, et al. Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) gene mutations in women with unexplained infertility and recurrent failure of implantation after IVF and embryo transfer. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2004; 112(1):69-73. [DOI:10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00315-4] [PMID]
  33. Bourdiec A, Akoum A. [Embryo implantation: Role of interleukin 1 family members (French)]. Medecine Sciences. 2014; 30(6-7):644-50. [DOI:10.1051/medsci/20143006014] [PMID]
  34. Bigonnesse F, Labelle Y, Akoum A. Triphasic expression of interleukin-1 receptor type I in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle of fertile women and women with unexplained infertility. Fertility and Sterility. 2001; ;75(1):79-87.[DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01634-4] [PMID]
  35. Singh M, Chaudhry P, Asselin E. Bridging endometrial receptivity and implantation: Network of hormones, cytokines, and growth factors. Journal of Endocrinology. 2011; 210(1):5-14. [DOI:10.1530/JOE-10-0461] [PMID]
  36. Dimitriadis E, Menkhorst E, Salamonsen LA, Paiva P. LIF and IL11 in trophoblast-endometrial interactions during the establishment of pregnancy. Placenta. 2010; 31 Suppl:S99-104.[DOI:10.1016/j.placenta.2009.12.027] [PMID]
  37. Marwood M, Visser K, Salamonsen LA, Dimitriadis E. Interleukin-11 and leukemia inhibitory factor regulate the adhesion of endometrial epithelial cells: Implications in fertility regulation. Endocrinology. 2009; 150(6):2915-23. [DOI:10.1210/en.2008-1538] [PMID]
  38. Karpovich N, Klemmt P, Hwang JH, McVeigh JE, Heath JK, Barlow DH, et al. The production of interleukin-11 and decidualization are compromised in endometrial stromal cells derived from patients with infertility. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2005. 90(3):1607-12. [DOI:10.1210/jc.2004-0868] [PMID]
  39. von Rango U, Alfer J, Kertschanska S, Kemp B, Müller-Newen G, Heinrich PC, et al. Interleukin-11 expression: Its significance in eutopic and ectopic human implantation. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2004; 10(11):783-92. [DOI:10.1093/molehr/gah107] [PMID]
  40. Lee RS, Li N, Ledgard AM, Pollard JW. Dynamic regulation of expression of colony-stimulating factor 1 in the reproductive tract of cattle during the estrous cycle and in pregnancy. Biology of Reproduction. 2003; 69(2):518-28. [DOI:10.1095/biolreprod.102.013748] [PMID]
  41. Lee KY, DeMayo FJ. Animal models of implantation. Reproduction. 2004;  128(6):679-95. [DOI:10.1530/rep.1.00340] [PMID]
  42. Kim SM, Kim JS. A review of mechanisms of implantation. Development & Reproduction. 2017; 21(4):351-9. [DOI:10.12717/DR.2017.21.4.351] [PMID]
  43. Wieduwilt MJ, Moasser MM. The epidermal growth factor receptor family: Biology driving targeted therapeutics. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2008; 65(10):1566-84. [DOI:10.1007/s00018-008-7440-8] [PMID]
  44. Byun HS, Lee GS, Lee BM, Hyun SH, Choi KC, Jeung EB. Implantation-related expression of epidermal growth factor family molecules and their regulation by progesterone in the pregnant rat. Reproductive Sciences. 2008; 15(7):678-89. [DOI:10.1177/1933719108317581] [PMID]
  45. Aghajanova L, Bjuresten K, Altmäe S, Landgren BM, Stavreus-Evers A. HB-EGF but not amphiregulin or their receptors HER1 and HER4 is altered in endometrium of women with unexplained infertility. Reproductive Sciences. 2008; 15(5):484-92. [DOI:10.1177/1933719108314624] [PMID]
  46. Sferruzzi-Perri AN, Owens JA, Pringle KG, Roberts CT. The neglected role of insulin-like growth factors in the maternal circulation regulating fetal growth. The Journal of Physiology. 2011; 589(Pt 1):7-20.  [DOI:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.198622] [PMID]
  47. Simmons RM, Erikson DW, Kim J, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, et al. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in the ruminant uterus: Potential endometrial marker and regulator of conceptus elongation. Endocrinology. 2009; 150(9):4295-305. [DOI:10.1210/en.2009-0060] [PMID]
  48. Wu RJ, Zhou FZ. [Insulin-like growth factor II and its receptor gene expression in the endometrium of women with unexplained infertility (Chinese)]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2004; 39(4):242-5. [PMID]
  49. Jones RL, Stoikos C, Findlay JK, Salamonsen LA. TGF-β superfamily expression and actions in the endometrium and placenta. Reproduction. 2006; 132(2):217-32. [DOI:10.1530/rep.1.01076] [PMID]
  50. Caron PL, Fréchette-Frigon G, Shooner C, Leblanc V, Asselin E. Transforming growth factor beta isoforms regulation of Akt activity and XIAP levels in rat endometrium during estrous cycle, in a model of pseudopregnancy and in cultured decidual cells. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2009; 7:80. [DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-7-80] [PMID]
  51. Lessey BA, Gui Y, Apparao KB, Young SL, Mulholland J. Regulated expression of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) in the human endometrium: A potential paracrine role during implantation. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 2002; 62(4):446-55. [DOI:10.1002/mrd.10129] [PMID]
  52. Stavreus-Evers A, Aghajanova L, Brismar H, Eriksson H, Landgren BM, Hovatta O. Co-existence of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor and pinopodes in human endometrium at the time of implantation. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2002; 8(8):765-9.  [DOI:10.1093/molehr/8.8.765] [PMID]
  53. Xie H, Wang H, Tranguch S, Iwamoto R, Mekada E, Demayo FJ, et al. Maternal heparin-binding-EGF deficiency limits pregnancy success in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007; 104(46):18315-20. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.0707909104] [PMID]
  54. Moghani-Ghoroghi F, Moshkdanian G, Sehat M, Nematollahi-Mahani SN, Ragerdi-Kashani I, Pasbakhsh P. Melatonin pretreated blastocysts along with Calcitonin Administration improved implantation by upregulation of heparin binding-epidermal growth factor expression in murine endometrium. Cell Journal. 2018; 19(4):599-606. [PMID]
  55. Vitiello D, Kodaman PH, Taylor HS. HOX genes in implantation. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 2007; 25(6):431-6.  [DOI:10.1055/s-2007-991040] [PMID]
  56. Zanatta A, Rocha AM, Carvalho FM, Pereira RM, Taylor HS, Motta EL, et al. The role of the Hoxa10/HOXA10 gene in the etiology of endometriosis and its related infertility: A review. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2010; 27(12):701-10. [DOI:10.1007/s10815-010-9471-y] [PMID]
  57. Fischer CP, Kayisili U, Taylor HS. HOXA10 expression is decreased in endometrium of women with adenomyosis. Fertility and Sterility. 2011; 95(3):1133-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.060] [PMID]
  58. Graham SJ, Wicher KB, Jedrusik A, Guo G, Herath W, Robson P, et al. BMP signalling regulates the pre-implantation development of extra-embryonic cell lineages in the mouse embryo. Nature Communications. 2014; 5:5667. [DOI:10.1038/ncomms6667] [PMID]
  59. Sozen B, Demir N, Zernicka-Goetz M. BMP signalling is required for extra-embryonic ectoderm development during pre-to-post-implantation transition of the mouse embryo. Developmental Biology. 2021; 470:84-94. [DOI:10.1016/j.ydbio.2020.11.005] [PMID]

 
Review Paper: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2023/02/6 | Accepted: 2023/01/30 | Published: 2023/12/31

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb