Volume 17, Issue 65 (4-2008)                   JGUMS 2008, 17(65): 88-93 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Naderi B, Haghighi M, Sedighinezhad A, Mohammadzade A, Mirzazadeh B. The Comparison of Different Propofol Dose for Anesthesia Induction Based on BIS (bispectral index) Monitoring. JGUMS 2008; 17 (65) :88-93
URL: http://journal.gums.ac.ir/article-1-331-en.html
1- , Naderi_bahram@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (15053 Views)
Abstract Introduction: Propofol is a new intravenous hypnotic drug that in combine with a short acting opioid have been used in total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). The BIS provides additional information for standard monitoring techniques to recognize depth of sleep and achieve the appropriate dose of drug. Objective: Comparison of different propofol dose for anesthesia induction based on BIS (bispectral index) monitoring. Materials and Methods: forty five patients with ASA class I,II who underwent surgical operation on leg fracture were randomly assigned to 3 groups. Group A with a propofol dose of 1mg/kg, Group B at a dose of 1.5mg/kg and Group C at a dose of 2mg/kg were studied .Remifentanyl (0.5mcg/kg) was added to propofol as opioid drug. The method of BIS index (50-60) has been used for determination of consciousness level and the depth of sleep and for achieving the appropriate dose of propofol. The patients were evaluated to determine occurrence of hypotension, bradycardia, the presence of intubation movement and the autonomic signs. Results: The mean levels of BIS was 58.8±9.85 in the Group A, 50.2±6.55 in Group B, and 44±5.65 in Group C. Comparison between the mean levels of BIS revealed that the Group A was significantly different with the other two groups(p=0.009).Optimum level of BIS was significantly different in 3 groups .group B (%66.7), group A (%40), group C(%20), less than of all groups (P=0.034). Hypertension incidence following intubation in group A was 33.3% and Group B was (%6.7)and in group C wasn’t any hypertension which detected a significantly different between three groups(P=0.018). Regarding to need further propofol dose, there was a significant difference(P<0.001). In group A, it was in %40 of cases, and in groups B and C it was not observed. Regarding to tachycardia, bradycardia, hypotension, movement and autonomic signs, there was no significantly different between 3 groups. Conclusion: It was appeared that group A is not appropriate due to incompatible with BIS, need Further propofol dose and hypertension. Considering the best BIS level in group B and lack of any benefit in group C for further propofol in achieving the optimum level of BIS (50-60), can be concluded that group B with propofol (1.5mg/kg) is the best dose for achieving the desired level of BIS with remifentanil at the mentioned dose.
Keywords: BIS, Propofol, TIVA
Full-Text [PDF 139 kb]   (2004 Downloads)    
Review Paper: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2013/12/22 | Accepted: 2013/12/22 | Published: 2013/12/22

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb