Volume 30, Issue 4 (1-2022)                   JGUMS 2022, 30(4): 314-325 | Back to browse issues page

Research code: 2239
Ethics code: IR.GUMS.REC.1398.260


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shokrgozar S, Varasteh M, Isanazar A, Zavarmousavi M, Fallahi-Khesht Masjedi M. Prevalence of Involuntary Hospital Admission Among Patients Referred by Judicial Authorities to A Psychiatric Hospital in Iran. JGUMS 2022; 30 (4) :314-325
URL: http://journal.gums.ac.ir/article-1-2384-en.html
1- Kavosh Cognitive Behavior Sciences and Addiction Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
2- Kavosh Cognitive Behavior Sciences and Addiction Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. , adele.isanazar@yahoo.com
3- Raz Counseling and Psychological Services Center, Rasht, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 4402 kb]   (470 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1943 Views)
Full-Text:   (2167 Views)
1. Introduction
Various laws and regulations has long been formulated to protect the social rights of individuals in society including mentally-ill patients [1]. Involuntary hospital admission refers to the hospitalization of patients against their will. Involuntary hospital admission of mentally-ill patients is usually done to protect them and to protect the society against their abnormal behaviours [2]. In most societies, jurisdictions allow involuntary hospital admission of a mentally-ill patient, although the definition of mental illness varies in the jurisdiction of different countries in terms of the period of admission before independent examination, involuntary hospitalization, and the role of scientific decision-making supported by judicial authorities [4]. In the jurisdictions of different countries, almost the same procedures are used for the admission, detention and compulsory treatment of the mentally ill, which demonstrates compliance with international standards and the integration of human rights principles [5]. The purpose of this study is to investigate the referral cases from judicial authorities to Shafa Psychiatric Hospital in Rasht, Iran in 2018 to help solve the problem of involuntary hospital admission.
2. Methods
This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. The study population included the medical records of all patients referred to Shafa Hospital by judicial authorities in 2018. For sampling, the census method was used. The inclusion criteria was availability of all cases admitted by a court letter and the exclusion criteria was incomplete information in medical records. All eligible files were first confirmed using the Hospital Information System (HIS) and then the files were delivered based their numbers from the hospital archives department and the information including demographic characteristics (age, gender, place of residence, marital status, education, occupation), reasons for referral (psychiatric symptoms, risk of self-harm, risk of harm to others, need for treatment), criminal history, history of psychiatric disorders, history of hospitalization in a psychiatric hospital,  and type of psychiatric disorder were extracted from medical records and court letters were extracted using a checklist. After collecting the information, they were entered in IBM SPSS v.21 software, and analyzed using the inferential statics, including t-test and chi-square test.
3. Results
In this study, most of cases was for patients who were male (96.8%), and single (57.6%) living in urban areas (78.8%). In 217 referral cases, the most common reason for referral was “dispatch and hospitalization” (44.9%) followed by “the need for treatment” (29.6%). Most of referral cases (94.9%) had a history of psychiatric disorders, while the percentage of cases without a history of psychiatric disorders was only 5.1%. The most common reported history of psychiatric disorders was "schizophrenia" (40.4%) followed by "substance abuse" (27.1%). Of 217 cases, 251 had mentioned the type of psychiatric diagnoses (some with more than one diagnosed type; e.g. both personality disorder and major depressive disorder). The most common type of diagnosed psychiatric disorder was "schizophrenia" (37.5%) followed by "substance use disorder" (21.9%) and "bipolar disorder" (15.5%). The results of Chi-square test showed a significant relationship between the history of psychiatric disorder and criminal history (X2= 10.336, P=0.001), but the history of psychiatric disorder had no significant relationship with age, education, and employment status in referral cases.
4. Conclusion
 Based on our findings, although the reasons for the majority of involuntary hospital admissions in the study hospital were the dispatch & hospitalization and the need for treatment, and most of patients had psychiatric disorders, in some cases, the reason for referral was inappropriate. Since hospitalization imposes additional financial and psychological burden on the individual, despite the legal requirements for involuntary hospital admissions, the patients need to be visited by a psychiatrist prior to hospitalization; if there was no need for hospitalization, it should be informed to the judicial authorities and the mere existence of a court letter cannot be a criterion for involuntary hospital admission and give the patient the title of mentally-ill person. This indicates the need for more coordination between the judicial authorities and the medical centers in admitting these patients to the hospitals.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Guilan University of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.GUMS.REC.1398.260). Ethical principles are fully observed in this article. 

Funding
This study was extracted from the thesis of second author. This research has not received any financial support from profit and non-profit organizations. 

Authors' contributions
Conceptualization, visualization, project administration, and resources: All authors; Methodology and formal analysis: Mahnaz Fallahi-Khesht; Original draft preparation: Somayeh Shokrgozar, Adele Isanazar, Maryam Zavarmousavi; Editing & review, Investigation and supervision: Somayeh Shokrgozar, Adele Isanazar; Data collection: Mohadeseh Varasteh. 

Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest. 

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the HIS manager in Shafa Hospital for cooperation in collecting information.


References
  1. Valipour M, Zarghami M, Masoudzadeh A, Khalilian AR, Tirgari AH, Mosavi ST. [Study of psychiatrists’ knowledge, attitude, and practice toward compulsory admission of psychiatric patients and its related laws in Iran in 2006 (Persian)]. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2007; 17(61):148-60. http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-276-en.html
  2. Tuohimäki C, Kaltiala-Heino R, Korkeila J, Tuori T, Lehtinen V, Joukamaa M. The use of harmful to others-criterion for involuntary treatment in Finland. European Journal of Health Law. 2003; 10(2):183-99. [DOI:10.1163/092902703769681614] [PMID]
  3. Nasr Esfahani M, Attari Moghadam J, Rasoulian M, Ghalehbandi MF, Saberi SM, Samimi-Ardestani SM, et al. [Involuntary treatment and hospitalization: Review of mental health acts (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2008; 14(1):4-16. http://ijpcp.iums.ac.ir/article-1-409-en.html
  4. Cronin T, Gouda P, McDonald C, Hallahan B. A comparison of mental health legislation in five developed countries: A narrative review. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2017; 34(4):261-9. [DOI:10.1017/ipm.2017.48] [PMID]
  5. Dey S, Mellsop G, Diesfeld K, Dharmawardene V, Mendis S, Chaudhuri S, et al. Comparing legislation for involuntary admission and treatment of mental illness in four South Asian countries. International Journal of Mental Health Systems. 2019; 13:67. [DOI:10.1186/s13033-019-0322-7] [PMID] [PMCID]
  6. Way BB, Banks S. Clinical factors related to admission and release decisions in psychiatric emergency services. Psychiatric Services. 2001; 52(2):214-8. [DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.52.2.214] [PMID]
  7. Salize HJ, Dressing H. Epidemiology of involuntary placement of mentally ill people across the European :union:. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2004; 184(2):163-8. [DOI:10.1192/bjp.184.2.163] [PMID]
  8. Curley A, Agada E, Emechebe A, Anamdi Ch, Ng XT, Duffy R, et al. Exploring and explaining involuntary care: The relationship between psychiatric admission status, gender and other demographic and clinical variables. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 2016; 47:53-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.02.034] [PMID]
  9. Hustoft K, Larsen TK, Brønnick K, Joa I, Johannessen JO, Ruud T. Voluntary or involuntary acute psychiatric hospitalization in Norway: A 24 h follow up study. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 2018; 56:27-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.10.011] [PMID]
  10. Zhou JS, Xiang YT, Zhu XM, Liang W, Li H, Yi J, et al. Voluntary and involuntary psychiatric admissions in China. Psychiatric Services. 2015; 66(12):1341-6. [DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201400566] [PMID]
  11. Schmitz-Buhl M, Gairing SK, Rietz Ch, Häussermann P, Zielasek J, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E. A retrospective analysis of determinants of involuntary psychiatric in-patient treatment. BMC Psychiatry. 2019; 19:127. [DOI:10.1186/s12888-019-2096-5] [PMID] [PMCID]
  12. Chang TMM, Ferreira LK, Ferreira MP, Hirata ES. Clinical and demographic differences between voluntary and involuntary psychiatric admissions in a university hospital in Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2013; 29(11):2347-52. [DOI:10.1590/0102-311x00041313] [PMID]
  13. Di Lorenzo R, Vecchi L, Artoni C, Mongelli F, Ferri P. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients involuntarily hospitalized in an Italian psychiatric ward: A 1-year retrospective analysis. Acta Biomedica. 2018; 89(6-S):17-28. [DOI:10.23750/abm.v89i6-S.7392] [PMID] [PMCID]
  14. Mann F, Bone JK, Lloyd-Evans B, Frerichs J, Pinfold V, Ma R, et al. A life less lonely: The state of the art in interventions to reduce loneliness in people with mental health problems. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2017; 52(6):627-38. [DOI:10.1007/s00127-017-1392-y] [PMID] [PMCID]
  15. Karasch O, Schmitz-Buhl M, Mennicken R, Zielasek J, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E. Identification of risk factors for involuntary psychiatric hospitalization: Using environmental socioeconomic data and methods of machine learning to improve prediction. BMC Psychiatry. 2020; 20:401. [DOI:10.1186/s12888-020-02803-w] [PMID] [PMCID]
  16. Keown P, McBride O, Twigg L, Crepaz-Keay D, Cyhlarova E, Parsons H, et al. Rates of voluntary and compulsory psychiatric in-patient treatment in England: An ecological study investigating associations with deprivation and demographics. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2016; 209(2):157-61. [DOI:10.1192/bjp.bp.115.171009] [PMID]
  17. van Os J, Hanssen M, de Graaf R, Vollebergh W. Does the urban environment independently increase the risk for both negative and positive features of psychosis? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2002; 37(10):460-4. [DOI:10.1007/s00127-002-0588-x] [PMID]
  18. Vassos E, Pedersen CB, Murray RM, Collier DA, Lewis CM. Meta-analysis of the association of urbanicity with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2012; 38(6):1118-23. [DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbs096] [PMID] [PMCID]
  19. Zhang S, Mellsop G, Brink J, Wang X. Involuntary admission and treatment of patients with mental disorder. Neuroscience Bulletin. 2015; 31(1):99-112. [DOI:10.1007/s12264-014-1493-5] [PMID] [PMCID]
  20. Canova Mosele PH, Chervenski Figueira G, Antônio Bertuol Filho A, Ferreira de Lima JAR, Calegaro VC. Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization and its relationship to psychopathology and aggression. Psychiatry Research. 2018; 265:13-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.031] [PMID]
  21. Lebenbaum M, Chiu M, Vigod S, Kurdyak P. Prevalence and predictors of involuntary psychiatric hospital admissions in Ontario, Canada: A population-based linked administrative database study. BJPsych Open. 2018; 4(2):31-8. [DOI:10.1192/bjo.2017.4] [PMID] [PMCID]
  22. Meadows G, Calder G, van Den Bos H. Police referrals to a psychiatric hospital: Indicators for referral and psychiatric outcome. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 1994; 28(2):259-68. [DOI:10.1080/00048679409075637] [PMID]
  23. Habit T, van Rooyen FC, Hiemstra LA. Involuntary admission of psychiatric patients in the Northern Cape Province and the accuracy of the initial psychiatric assessment done by the referring general practitioners. South African Family Practice. 2007; 49(6):14-14c. [DOI:10.1080/20786204.2007.10873566]
  24. Gandré C, Gervaix J, Thillard J, Macé JM, Roelandt JL, Chevreul K. Involuntary psychiatric admissions and development of psychiatric services as an alternative to full-time hospitalization in France. Psychiatric Services. 2017; 68(9):923-30. [DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201600453] [PMID]
Review Paper: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/07/13 | Accepted: 2021/12/26 | Published: 2022/01/21

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb